← All matchups

Polo BlueMotion vs 323F

Volkswagen · Mazda

1/4 Mile winner
Polo BlueMotion
Beats the 323F by 0.01s
Watch them race →

The verdict

In a quarter-mile drag race, the Polo BlueMotion beats the 323F by a hair, finishing 0.01 seconds ahead. It's tight on paper, but our simulator gives the edge to the Polo BlueMotion thanks to a slightly better power-to-weight balance.

Spec head-to-head

Power
85 hp
105 hp
0–100 km/h
10.5s
10.5s
Top speed
190 km/h
180 km/h
Engine
1.2L Diesel I3
1.6L Inline-4
Fuel
Diesel
Petrol
Torque
250 Nm
145 Nm
Price
$22,000
$16,000

Simulated race times

Distance
Polo BlueMotion
323F
100 m
7.987s
7.930s
1/8 mile
11.787s
11.738s
1/4 mile
17.674s
17.684s
1 km
31.507s
31.841s

Acceleration curves

Who should buy which?

If budget is the deciding factor, the 323F is the obvious pick at $16,000 versus the Polo BlueMotion's $22,000. Both are formidable. The Polo BlueMotion suits buyers who prioritise balance and finesse; the 323F appeals to those after the bigger output.

FAQ

Which is faster, the Polo BlueMotion or the 323F?

In our simulated 1/4 mile drag race, the Polo BlueMotion is faster, beating the 323F by 0.01 seconds.

What is the 0–100 km/h time of the Polo BlueMotion vs the 323F?

The Polo BlueMotion hits 100 km/h in 10.5 seconds, while the 323F does it in 10.5 seconds.

How much horsepower does each car have?

The Polo BlueMotion produces 85 hp; the 323F produces 105 hp.

What are the top speeds?

The Polo BlueMotion tops out at 190 km/h, and the 323F reaches 180 km/h.

Discussion (0)

Loading…