← All matchups

Polo Beats vs Puma

Volkswagen · Ford

1/4 Mile winner
Polo Beats
Beats the Puma by 0.06s
Watch them race →

The verdict

In a quarter-mile drag race, the Polo Beats beats the Puma by a hair, finishing 0.06 seconds ahead. It's tight on paper, but our simulator gives the edge to the Polo Beats thanks to a slightly better power-to-weight balance.

Spec head-to-head

Power
95 hp
123 hp
0–100 km/h
9.5s
9.6s
Top speed
187 km/h
191 km/h
Engine
1.0L I3 Turbo
Turbocharged Inline-3
Fuel
Petrol
Petrol
Torque
175 Nm
200 Nm
Price
$22,000
$28,000

Simulated race times

Distance
Polo Beats
Puma
100 m
7.620s
7.675s
1/8 mile
11.280s
11.346s
1/4 mile
16.996s
17.057s
1 km
30.612s
30.575s

Acceleration curves

Who should buy which?

If budget is the deciding factor, the Polo Beats is the obvious pick at $22,000 versus the Puma's $28,000. Both are formidable. The Polo Beats suits buyers who prioritise balance and finesse; the Puma appeals to those after the bigger output.

FAQ

Which is faster, the Polo Beats or the Puma?

In our simulated 1/4 mile drag race, the Polo Beats is faster, beating the Puma by 0.06 seconds.

What is the 0–100 km/h time of the Polo Beats vs the Puma?

The Polo Beats hits 100 km/h in 9.5 seconds, while the Puma does it in 9.6 seconds.

How much horsepower does each car have?

The Polo Beats produces 95 hp; the Puma produces 123 hp.

What are the top speeds?

The Polo Beats tops out at 187 km/h, and the Puma reaches 191 km/h.

Discussion (0)

Loading…