← All matchups

Space Runner vs Niro Touring

Mitsubishi · Kia

1/4 Mile winner
Space Runner
Beats the Niro Touring by 0.00s
Watch them race →

The verdict

In a quarter-mile drag race, the Space Runner beats the Niro Touring by a hair, finishing 0.00 seconds ahead. It's tight on paper, but our simulator gives the edge to the Space Runner thanks to a slightly better power-to-weight balance.

Spec head-to-head

Power
140 hp
139 hp
0–100 km/h
10.5s
10.5s
Top speed
185 km/h
180 km/h
Engine
1.8L MIVEC
1.6L 4-Cylinder Hybrid
Fuel
Petrol
Hybrid
Torque
170 Nm
265 Nm
Price
$21,500
$33,000

Simulated race times

Distance
Space Runner
Niro Touring
100 m
7.960s
7.930s
1/8 mile
11.764s
11.738s
1/4 mile
17.679s
17.684s
1 km
31.667s
31.841s

Acceleration curves

Who should buy which?

If budget is the deciding factor, the Space Runner is the obvious pick at $21,500 versus the Niro Touring's $33,000. Both are formidable. The Space Runner suits buyers who prioritise raw power; the Niro Touring appeals to those after a more focused experience.

FAQ

Which is faster, the Space Runner or the Niro Touring?

In our simulated 1/4 mile drag race, the Space Runner is faster, beating the Niro Touring by 0.00 seconds.

What is the 0–100 km/h time of the Space Runner vs the Niro Touring?

The Space Runner hits 100 km/h in 10.5 seconds, while the Niro Touring does it in 10.5 seconds.

How much horsepower does each car have?

The Space Runner produces 140 hp; the Niro Touring produces 139 hp.

What are the top speeds?

The Space Runner tops out at 185 km/h, and the Niro Touring reaches 180 km/h.

Discussion (0)

Loading…